판사는 Terraform 사건 기각 신청을 거부하고 Ripple 결정에 동의하지 않습니다.

판사는 Terraform 사건 기각 신청을 거부하고 Ripple 결정에 동의하지 않습니다.

타임 스탬프 : 31 년 2023 월 7 일 오후 59:XNUMX

A United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit against Terraform Labs is set to go ahead after a U.S. judge overseeing the case denied the firm’s motion to dismiss on July 31. 

In handing down the order, the judge also rejected a decision from another judge who ruled that Ripple did not violate securities laws based on their manner of sale.

SEC 퍼스트 소송을 제기하다 against Terraform Labs and its founder Do Kwon on Feb 16, alleging it was once “orchestrating a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud.”

In April, Terraform Labs’ legal representatives filed a motion for the dismissal of the suit, with supplemental materials for the motion provided in June. 

Judge rejects motion to dismiss Terraform case, disagrees with Ripple decision PlatoBlockchain Data Intelligence. Vertical Search. Ai.
Rakoff 판사는 Terraform Labs의 기각 신청을 거부합니다. 출처: 법정 청취자

In rejecting the defendants’ motion to dismiss, Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District Court of New York 발견 그 :

"이 동의의 목적을 위해, 모든 정당한 주장은 사실로 간주되어야 하며, 그로부터의 모든 합리적인 추론은 SEC의 호의로 이끌어져야 합니다."

이전 해고 동의에서 Terraform Labs의 대표는 SEC가 회사와 설립자 모두에 대한 관할권이 없다고 주장했습니다. 또한 미러 프로토콜(MIR), 테라 클래식(LUNC) 및 테라USD 클래식(USTC)을 포함한 토큰이 증권이라는 기관의 입장에 반발했습니다.

It also argued, in light of the Supreme Court ruling on the major questions doctrine, “Congress is not only engaging in robust debate over how crypto should be regulated, it is asking the SEC to wait for Congress to act.”

It went on to cite a procedural issue in the agency’s suit against Coinbase and its newly divulged emails concerning former SEC director William Hinman that figured in the agency’s suit against Ripple 실험실.

However, Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District Court of New York 쓴 that “it would ignore reality to place the crypto-currency industry and the American energy and tobacco industries,” implying that the major questions doctrine may not apply to the case and thus dismissing that objection. The procedural questions were also dismissed.

The judge devoted several pages to an analysis of the Howey test, which was at the heart of the Hinman discussion. No formal contract is necessary to meet the test, and tokens themselves may be considered tokens in arguments before the court, Rakoff wrote.

관련 : SEC 항소는 Ripple 승리를 증폭시킬 수 있다고 Ripple Labs 법무 책임자는 말합니다.

법원은 또한 "판매 방식에 따라 이러한 코인(미르와 루나)을 구별"하는 것을 거부했습니다. 그러므로:

"법원은 유사한 사건인 SEC 대 Ripple Labs Inc. [...] Howey가 [XNUMX차 및 XNUMX차] 구매자를 구분하지 않는 유사한 사건에서 최근 이 지역의 다른 판사가 채택한 접근 방식을 거부합니다."

That approach – that XRP (XRP) was a commodity when sold on the secondary market – was a partial win for Ripple. Its rejection here could bode well for the SEC, if other judges follow Rakoff’s example.

매거진 : 담보로 오만함을 사용했기 때문에 테라가 무너졌습니다 — Knifefight

타임 스탬프 :

더보기 코인 텔레그래프