BosonSampling.jl: A Julia Package For Quantum Multi-photon Interferometry

Republished By Plato

Followers: 0

BosonSampling.jl: A Julia package for quantum multi-photon interferometry PlatoBlockchain Data Intelligence. Vertical Search. Ai.

Benoit Seron and Antoine Restivo

Quantum Information and Communication, Ecole polytechnique de Bruxelles, CP 165/59, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

We present a free open source package for high performance simulation and numerical investigation of boson samplers and, more generally, multi-photon interferometry. Our package is written in Julia, allowing C-like performance with easy notations and fast, high-level coding. Underlying building blocks can easily be modified without complicated low-level language modifications. We present a great variety of routines for tasks related to boson sampling, such as statistical tools, optimization methods and classical samplers. Special emphasis is put on validation of experiments, where we present novel algorithms. This package goes beyond the boson sampling paradigm, allowing for the investigation of new interferometric behaviours such as bosonic bunching.

► BibTeX data

@article{Seron2024bosonsamplingjl, doi = {10.22331/q-2024-06-18-1378}, url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-06-18-1378}, title = {Boson{S}ampling.jl: {A} {J}ulia package for quantum multi-photon interferometry}, author = {Seron, Benoit and Restivo, Antoine}, journal = {{Quantum}}, issn = {2521-327X}, publisher = {{Verein zur F{“{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}}, volume = {8}, pages = {1378}, month = jun, year = {2024} }

► References

[1] Richard P Feynman. Simulating physics with computers. In Feynman and computation, pages 133–153. CRC Press, 2018. 10.1007/BF02650179. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

[2] Peter W Shor. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. In Proceedings 35th annual symposium on foundations of computer science, pages 124–134. Ieee, 1994. 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700.
https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700

[3] Max Tillmann, Borivoje Dakić, René Heilmann, Stefan Nolte, Alexander Szameit, and Philip Walther. Experimental boson sampling. Nature Photonics, 7 (7): 540–544, may 2013. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.102. URL https://doi.org/10.1038.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.102

[4] John Preskill. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum, 2: 79, 2018. 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

[5] John Preskill. Quantum computing 40 years later. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10522, 2021. 10.1201/9781003358817-7.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003358817-7
arXiv:2106.10522

[6] Scott Aaronson and Alex Arkhipov. The computational complexity of linear optics. In Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 333–342, 2011. 10.1145/1993636.1993682.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1993636.1993682

[7] Saleh Rahimi-Keshari, Timothy C Ralph, and Carlton M Caves. Sufficient conditions for efficient classical simulation of quantum optics. Physical Review X, 6 (2): 021039, 2016. 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021039.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021039

[8] Jelmer J Renema, Adrian Menssen, William R Clements, Gil Triginer, William S Kolthammer, and Ian A Walmsley. Efficient classical algorithm for boson sampling with partially distinguishable photons. Physical review letters, 120 (22): 220502, 2018a. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.220502.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.220502

[9] Michał Oszmaniec and Daniel J Brod. Classical simulation of photonic linear optics with lost particles. New Journal of Physics, 20 (9): 092002, 2018. 10.1088/1367-2630/aadfa8.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aadfa8

[10] Raúl García-Patrón, Jelmer J Renema, and Valery Shchesnovich. Simulating boson sampling in lossy architectures. Quantum, 3: 169, 2019. 10.22331/q-2019-08-05-169.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-08-05-169

[11] Daniel Jost Brod and Michał Oszmaniec. Classical simulation of linear optics subject to nonuniform losses. Quantum, 4: 267, 2020. 10.22331/q-2020-05-14-267.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-05-14-267

[12] Jelmer Renema, Valery Shchesnovich, and Raul Garcia-Patron. Classical simulability of noisy boson sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01953, 2018b. 10.48550/arXiv.1809.01953.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.01953
arXiv:1809.01953

[13] Valery S Shchesnovich. Noise in boson sampling and the threshold of efficient classical simulatability. Physical Review A, 100 (1): 012340, 2019. 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.012340.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.012340

[14] Marco Bentivegna, Nicolò Spagnolo, Chiara Vitelli, Fulvio Flamini, Niko Viggianiello, Ludovico Latmiral, Paolo Mataloni, Daniel J. Brod, Ernesto F. Galvão, Andrea Crespi, Roberta Ramponi, Roberto Osellame, and Fabio Sciarrino. Experimental scattershot boson sampling. Science Advances, 1 (3), apr 2015. 10.1126/sciadv.1400255. URL https://doi.org/10.1126.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400255

[15] Craig S. Hamilton, Regina Kruse, Linda Sansoni, Sonja Barkhofen, Christine Silberhorn, and Igor Jex. Gaussian boson sampling. Physical Review Letters, 119 (17), oct 2017. 10.1103/physrevlett.119.170501. URL https://doi.org/10.1103.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.119.170501

[16] Zhong, Han-Sen and Wang, Hui and Deng, Yu-Hao and Chen, Ming-Cheng and Peng, Li-Chao and Luo, Yi-Han and Qin, Jian and Wu, Dian and Ding, Xing and Hu, Yi and others. Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science, 370 (6523): 1460–1463, 2020. 10.1126/science.abe8770.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8770

[17] Han-Sen Zhong, Yu-Hao Deng, Jian Qin, Hui Wang, Ming-Cheng Chen, Li-Chao Peng, Yi-Han Luo, Dian Wu, Si-Qiu Gong, Hao Su, et al. Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light. Physical review letters, 127 (18): 180502, 2021. 10.1364/IPRSN.2022.ITu3B.1.
https://doi.org/10.1364/IPRSN.2022.ITu3B.1

[18] Madsen, Lars S and Laudenbach, Fabian and Askarani, Mohsen Falamarzi and Rortais, Fabien and Vincent, Trevor and Bulmer, Jacob FF and Miatto, Filippo M and Neuhaus, Leonhard and Helt, Lukas G and Collins, Matthew J and others. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature, 606 (7912): 75–81, 2022. 10.1038/s41586-022-04725-x.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04725-x

[19] Yu-Hao Deng, Yi-Chao Gu, Hua-Liang Liu, Si-Qiu Gong, Hao Su, Zhi-Jiong Zhang, Hao-Yang Tang, Meng-Hao Jia, Jia-Min Xu, Ming-Cheng Chen, et al. Gaussian boson sampling with pseudo-photon-number resolving detectors and quantum computational advantage. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12240, 2023. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.150601.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.150601
arXiv:2304.12240

[20] Dominik Hangleiter and Jens Eisert. Computational advantage of quantum random sampling. Reviews of Modern Physics, 95 (3): 035001, 2023. 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.035001.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.035001

[21] Hui Wang, Jian Qin, Xing Ding, Ming-Cheng Chen, Si Chen, Xiang You, Yu-Ming He, Xiao Jiang, L You, Z Wang, et al. Boson sampling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferometer in a $10^{14}$-dimensional Hilbert space. Physical review letters, 123 (25): 250503, 2019. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.250503.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.250503

[22] Carsten Robens, Iñigo Arrazola, Wolfgang Alt, Dieter Meschede, Lucas Lamata, Enrique Solano, and Andrea Alberti. Boson sampling with ultracold atoms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12253, 2022. 10.48550/arXiv.2208.12253.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.12253
arXiv:2208.12253

[23] Aaron W. Young, Shawn Geller, William J. Eckner, Nathan Schine, Scott Glancy, Emanuel Knill, and Adam M. Kaufman. An atomic boson sampler, 2023. 10.1038/s41586-024-07304-4.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07304-4

[24] Seron, Benoit and Restivo, Antoine. BosonSampling.jl. URL https://github.com/benoitseron/BosonSampling.jl.git.
https://github.com/benoitseron/BosonSampling.jl.git

[25] Benoı̂t Seron and Antoine Restivo. Bosonsampling.jl documentation. URL https://docs.juliahub.com/BosonSampling/olGSq/1.0.1/.
https://docs.juliahub.com/BosonSampling/olGSq/1.0.1/

[26] George Datseris. Dynamicalsystems.jl: A julia software library for chaos and nonlinear dynamics. Journal of Open Source Software, 3 (23): 598, 2018. 10.21105/joss.00598. URL https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00598.
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00598

[27] Satellitetoolbox. URL https://juliaspace.github.io/SatelliteToolbox.jl/dev/.
https://juliaspace.github.io/SatelliteToolbox.jl/dev/

[28] Jeffrey Regier, Kiran Pamnany, Ryan Giordano, Rollin Thomas, David Schlegel, Jon McAuliffe, et al. Learning an astronomical catalog of the visible universe through scalable bayesian inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.03404, 2016. 10.48550/arXiv.1611.03404.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.03404
arXiv:1611.03404

[29] Ali Ramadhan, Gregory LeClaire Wagner, Chris Hill, Jean-Michel Campin, Valentin Churavy, Tim Besard, Andre Souza, Alan Edelman, Raffaele Ferrari, and John Marshall. Oceananigans.jl: Fast and friendly geophysical fluid dynamics on gpus. Journal of Open Source Software, 5 (53): 2018, 2020. 10.21105/joss.02018. URL https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02018.
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02018

[30] Ranjan Anantharaman, Kimberly Hall, Viral B. Shah, and Alan Edelman. Circuitscape in julia: High performance connectivity modelling to support conservation decisions. Proceedings of the JuliaCon Conferences, 1 (1): 58, 2020. 10.21105/jcon.00058. URL https://doi.org/10.21105/jcon.00058.
https://doi.org/10.21105/jcon.00058

[31] Piotr Gawron, Dariusz Kurzyk, and Łukasz Pawela. QuantumInformation.jl—a julia package for numerical computation in quantum information theory. PLOS ONE, 13 (12): e0209358, dec 2018. 10.1371/journal.pone.0209358. URL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209358.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209358

[32] Xiu-Zhe Luo, Jin-Guo Liu, Pan Zhang, and Lei Wang. Yao.jl: Extensible, efficient framework for quantum algorithm design. Quantum, 4: 341, oct 2020. 10.22331/q-2020-10-11-341.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-10-11-341

[33] Sebastian Krämer, David Plankensteiner, Laurin Ostermann, and Helmut Ritsch. QuantumOptics.jl: A julia framework for simulating open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications, 227: 109–116, jun 2018. 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.02.004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.02.004

[34] David Plankensteiner, Christoph Hotter, and Helmut Ritsch. QuantumCumulants.jl: A julia framework for generalized mean-field equations in open quantum systems. Quantum, 6: 617, jan 2022. 10.22331/q-2022-01-04-617.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-01-04-617

[35] Jeff Bezanson, Stefan Karpinski, Viral B. Shah, and Alan Edelman. Julia: A fast dynamic language for technical computing. 2012. 10.48550/ARXIV.1209.5145. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.5145.
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1209.5145
arXiv:1209.5145

[36] Avik Sengupta. Julia High Performance. Packt, 2019. ISBN 978-1-78829-811-7.

[37] Benoît Seron, Leonardo Novo, and Nicolas J. Cerf. Boson bunching is not maximized by indistinguishable particles, 2022a. 10.1038/s41566-023-01213-0.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01213-0

[38] VS Shchesnovich. Universality of generalized bunching and efficient assessment of boson sampling. Physical review letters, 116 (12): 123601, 2016a. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.123601.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.123601

[39] Benoit Seron, Leonardo Novo, Alex Arkhipov, and Nicolas J Cerf. Efficient validation of boson sampling from binned photon-number distributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09643, 2022b. 10.48550/arXiv.2212.09643.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09643
arXiv:2212.09643

[40] Mattia Walschaers, Jack Kuipers, Juan-Diego Urbina, Klaus Mayer, Malte Christopher Tichy, Klaus Richter, and Andreas Buchleitner. Statistical benchmark for bosonsampling. New Journal of Physics, 18 (3): 032001, 2016. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/032001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/032001

[41] Mattia Walschaers. Statistical Benchmarks for Quantum Transport in Complex Systems: From Characterisation to Design. Springer, 2018. 10.1007/978-3-319-93151-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93151-7

[42] Malte C Tichy, Klaus Mayer, Andreas Buchleitner, and Klaus Mølmer. Stringent and efficient assessment of boson-sampling devices. Physical review letters, 113 (2): 020502, 2014. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020502.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020502

[43] Christoph Dittel, Gabriel Dufour, Mattia Walschaers, Gregor Weihs, Andreas Buchleitner, and Robert Keil. Totally destructive many-particle interference. Physical Review Letters, 120 (24): 240404, 2018. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.240404.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.240404

[44] Niko Viggianiello, Fulvio Flamini, Luca Innocenti, Daniele Cozzolino, Marco Bentivegna, Nicolò Spagnolo, Andrea Crespi, Daniel J Brod, Ernesto F Galvão, Roberto Osellame, et al. Experimental generalized quantum suppression law in sylvester interferometers. New Journal of Physics, 20 (3): 033017, 2018. 10.1088/1367-2630/aaad92.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aaad92

[45] Andrea Crespi. Suppression laws for multiparticle interference in sylvester interferometers. Physical Review A, 91 (1): 013811, 2015. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013811.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013811

[46] Valery Shchesnovich. Distinguishing noisy boson sampling from classical simulations. Quantum, 5: 423, March 2021. ISSN 2521-327X. 10.22331/q-2021-03-29-423. URL https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-03-29-423.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-03-29-423

[47] Jelmer J Renema. Marginal probabilities in boson samplers with arbitrary input states. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14917, 2020. 10.48550/arXiv.2012.14917.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.14917
arXiv:2012.14917

[48] Traian Abrudan, Jan Eriksson, and Visa Koivunen. Conjugate gradient algorithm for optimization under unitary matrix constraint. Signal Processing, 89 (9): 1704–1714, 2009. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.03.015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.03.015

[49] Keith R Motes, Alexei Gilchrist, Jonathan P Dowling, and Peter P Rohde. Scalable boson sampling with time-bin encoding using a loop-based architecture. Physical review letters, 113 (12): 120501, 2014. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.120501.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.120501

[50] Georgios M Nikolopoulos and Thomas Brougham. Decision and function problems based on boson sampling. Physical Review A, 94 (1): 012315, jul 2016. 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012315. URL https://doi.org/10.1103%2Fphysreva.94.012315.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012315

[51] Nikolopoulos, Georgios M. Cryptographic one-way function based on boson sampling. Quantum Information Processing, 18 (8): 1–25, jul 2019. 10.1007/s11128-019-2372-9. URL https://doi.org/10.10072Fs11128-019-2372-9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2372-9

[52] Xiao-Wei Wang, Wen-Hao Zhou, Yu-Xuan Fu, Jun Gao, Yong-Heng Lu, Yi-Jun Chang, Lu-Feng Qiao, Ruo-Jing Ren, Ze-Kun Jiang, Zhi-Qiang Jiao, Georgios M. Nikolopoulos, and Xian-Min Jin. Experimental boson sampling enabling cryptographic one-way function. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130: 060802, Feb 2023. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.060802. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.060802.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.060802

[53] Deepesh Singh, Boxiang Fu, Gopikrishnan Muraleedharan, Chen-Mou Cheng, Nicolas Roussy Newton, Peter P. Rohde, and Gavin K. Brennen. Proof-of-work consensus by quantum sampling. 2023. 10.48550/arXiv.2305.19865.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.19865

[54] Fuzhen Zhang. An update on a few permanent conjectures. Special Matrices, 4 (1), 2016. 10.1515/spma-2016-0030.
https://doi.org/10.1515/spma-2016-0030

[55] Valery S Shchesnovich. The permanent-on-top conjecture is false. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 490: 196–201, 2016b. 10.1016/j.laa.2015.10.034.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2015.10.034

[56] Simon Becker, Nilanjana Datta, Ludovico Lami, and Cambyse Rouzé. Convergence rates for the quantum central limit theorem. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 383 (1): 223–279, feb 2021. 10.1007/s00220-021-03988-1. URL https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00220-021-03988-1.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-03988-1

[57] M Correa Anguita, FHB Somhorst, R van der Meer, R Schadow, HJ Snijders, M de Goede, B Kassenberg, P Venderbosch, C Taballione, JP Epping, et al. Quantum photo-thermodynamics on a programmable photonic quantum processor. In Quantum 2.0, pages QTu3A–3. Optica Publishing Group, 2022. 10.1364/QUANTUM.2022.QTu3A.3.
https://doi.org/10.1364/QUANTUM.2022.QTu3A.3

[58] Malte C Tichy. Sampling of partially distinguishable bosons and the relation to the multidimensional permanent. Physical Review A, 91 (2): 022316, 2015. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022316.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022316

[59] Shi, Junheng and Byrnes, Tim. Gaussian boson sampling with partial distinguishability. 2021. 10.48550/ARXIV.2105.09583. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.09583.
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2105.09583
arXiv:2105.09583

[60] Peter Clifford and Raphaël Clifford. The classical complexity of boson sampling, 2017. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01260.
arXiv:1706.01260

[61] Alexandra E Moylett, Raú l García-Patrón, Jelmer J Renema, and Peter S Turner. Classically simulating near-term partially-distinguishable and lossy boson sampling. Quantum Science and Technology, 5 (1): 015001, nov 2019. 10.1088/2058-9565/ab5555. URL https://doi.org/10.1088.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab5555

[62] Mattia Walschaers. Signatures of many-particle interference. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53 (4): 043001, 2020. 10.1088/1361-6455/ab5c30.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/ab5c30

[63] Fulvio Flamini, Mattia Walschaers, Nicolò Spagnolo, Nathan Wiebe, Andreas Buchleitner, and Fabio Sciarrino. Validating multi-photon quantum interference with finite data. Quantum Science and Technology, 5 (4): 045005, 2020. 10.1088/2058-9565/aba03a.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aba03a

[64] C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59: 2044–2046, Nov 1987. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2044. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2044.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2044

[65] John Leech. H. j. ryser, combinatorial mathematics (carus mathematical monographs, no. 14; published by the mathematical association of america, distributed by john wiley and sons, 1963), xiv 154 pp., 30s. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 14 (1): 82–83, 1964. 10.1017/S0013091500011299.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0013091500011299

[66] Brajesh Gupt, Josh Izaac, and Nicolás Quesada. The walrus: a library for the calculation of hafnians, hermite polynomials and gaussian boson sampling. Journal of Open Source Software, 4 (44): 1705, 2019. 10.21105/joss.01705. URL https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01705.
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01705

[67] Nicolas Heurtel, Andreas Fyrillas, Grégoire de Gliniasty, Raphaël Le Bihan, Sébastien Malherbe, Marceau Pailhas, Boris Bourdoncle, Pierre-Emmanuel Emeriau, Rawad Mezher, Luka Music, Nadia Belabas, Benoît Valiron, Pascale Senellart, Shane Mansfield, and Jean Senellart. Perceval: A software platform for discrete variable photonic quantum computing, 2022. 10.22331/q-2023-02-21-931.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-02-21-931

[68] Javier Osca and Jiri Vala. Implementation of photon partial distinguishability in a quantum optical circuit simulation. 2022. 10.48550/ARXIV.2208.03250. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03250.
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2208.03250
arXiv:2208.03250

Cited by

[1] Benoit Seron, Leonardo Novo, and Nicolas J. Cerf, “Boson bunching is not maximized by indistinguishable particles”, Nature Photonics 17 8, 702 (2023).

[2] Lorenzo Carosini, Virginia Oddi, Francesco Giorgino, Lena M. Hansen, Benoit Seron, Simone Piacentini, Tobias Guggemos, Iris Agresti, Juan C. Loredo, and Philip Walther, “Programmable multiphoton quantum interference in a single spatial mode”, Science Advances 10 16, eadj0993 (2024).

[3] Stephen C. Wein, “Simulating photon counting from dynamic quantum emitters by exploiting zero-photon measurements”, Physical Review A 109 2, 023713 (2024).

[4] Léo Pioge, Benoit Seron, Leonardo Novo, and Nicolas J. Cerf, “Enhanced bunching of nearly indistinguishable bosons”, arXiv:2308.12226, (2023).

The above citations are from SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2024-06-19 10:20:40). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

On Crossref’s cited-by service no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2024-06-19 10:20:38).

This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.

SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
Source: https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2024-06-18-1378/

Time Stamp: June 18, 2024

Time Stamp: Mar 16, 2023

Republished By Plato

Abstract

► BibTeX data

► References

Cited by

Persistent nonlocality in an ultracold-atom environment

Optimizing Variational Quantum Algorithms with qBang: Efficiently Interweaving Metric and Momentum to Navigate Flat Energy Landscapes

Well-conditioned multi-product formulas for hardware-friendly Hamiltonian simulation

Avoiding symmetry roadblocks and minimizing the measurement overhead of adaptive variational quantum eigensolvers

On contraction coefficients, partial orders and approximation of capacities for quantum channels

Variational Quantum Algorithms for Semidefinite Programming

Towards Quantum Gravity in the Lab on Quantum Processors

Limitations of the Macaulay matrix approach for using the HHL algorithm to solve multivariate polynomial systems

A monogamy-of-entanglement game for subspace coset states

Quantum Correlations in the Minimal Scenario

About Us

Vertical Search & Ai

Platform

Stay Connected

Account