Zadeva Ripple, SEC se konča po 'skrajšani sodbi', vloženi pri PlatoBlockchain Data Intelligence. Navpično iskanje. Ai.

Ripple, zadeva SEC se konča po vloženi "skrajšani sodbi".

slika

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs have both called for a federal judge to make an immediate ruling on whether Ripple’s XRP sales violated U.S. securities laws.

In separate motions vložena on Saturday by Ripple and the SEC, both have se imenuje for a summary judgment in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. 

Skrajšane sodbe se predložijo sodišču, kadar vpletena stranka meni, da je na voljo dovolj dokazov za odločitev, ne da bi bilo treba nadaljevati sojenje.

Obe strani sta pozvali sodnico Analiso Torres, naj nemudoma odloči, ali je prodaja Ripple XRP kršila zakone ZDA o vrednostnih papirjih. Ripple je trdil, da je SEC zmanjkalo odgovorov, da bi dokazali, da je prodaja XRP »naložbena pogodba«, medtem ko je SEC trdno trdil, da je tako. 

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, in a Twitter post on Saturday, said the filings made it clear that the SEC “isn’t interested in applying the law.”

"Vse to želijo predelati v nedopustnem prizadevanju, da bi razširili svojo pristojnost daleč prek pooblastil, ki jim jih je podelil kongres," je dejal.

Meanwhile, Ripple general counsel Stuart Alderoty noted that “after two years of litigation,” the SEC is “unable to identify any contract for investment” and “cannot satisfy a single prong of the Supreme Court Howey test.”

V svojem predlogu za sodbo po skrajšanem postopku je Ripple trdil, da se zadeva SEC "spušča na nedopustno odprto uveljavljanje pristojnosti nad kakršnim koli prenosom sredstva."

The motion also argued that the SEC cannot establish that XRP tokenholders could not “reasonably expect profits” based on Ripple’s efforts as there were no contract obligations between Ripple and XRP tokenholders.

On the other hand, the SEC’s own motion for summary judgment argued that there can be an “investment contract” without a contract, any rights granted to the purchaser and without any obligations to the issuer.

But, Ripple argued in its motion, “that is not and should not be the law, because without these essential features there is nothing to which the Howey test can sensibly be applied.”

Povezano: Tožba SEC proti Ripplu: vse, kar morate vedeti

Ripple instead pointed to profits coming from “market forces of supply and demand,” something that the SEC “conceded,” according to the Ripple motion.

Pomen tega priznanja je bil poudarjeno by U.S. Attorney Jeremy Hogan in a Saturday post on Twitter, stating that “these concessions are perfect for a summary judgment.”

Odziv skupnosti

The filing of the Ripple and SEC motions brought about mostly positive sentiment from the XRP community, with one Twitter user believing “the end is near:”

Predlog za skrajšano sodbo je prišel skoraj dve leti po SEC je tožil Ripple, nekdanji izvršni direktor Christian Larsen in sedanji izvršni direktor Brad Garlinghouse decembra 2020 zaradi domnevnega zbiranja 1.3 milijarde dolarjev z neregistrirano prodajo vrednostnih papirjev prek XRP.

Če bo sodišče izvršilo skrajšano sodbo, bo sodna odločitev močno vplivala na določanje, katere kriptovalute predstavljajo vrednostni papir v skladu z zakonodajo ZDA o vrednostnih papirjih.

The XRP token rose to highs not seen since July following the motion filing — reaching nearly $0.40, but has fallen slightly since then and is currently priced at $0.34, po na CoinGecko.

Časovni žig:

Več od Cointelegraph