CTFC süüdistati Ooki DAO PlatoBlockchain Data Intelligence'i juhtumi tõttu "julge reguleerimise eest jõustamise teel". Vertikaalne otsing. Ai.

CTFC süüdistati Ooki DAO juhtumi tõttu "julge reguleerimise eest jõustamise teel".

pilt

The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has sparked strong criticism from the community after filing a federal civil enforcement action against members of decentralized autonomous organization Ooki DAO over digital asset trading violations.

22. septembril vabastama, the CFTC stated that it had filed and simultaneously settled charges against the founders of decentralized trading platform bZeroX Tom Bean and Kyle Kistner for their role in “illegally offering leveraged and margined retail commodity transactions in digital assets”

However, the community has kicked up a fuss over a simultaneous civil enforcement action against bZeroX’s associated Ooki DAO and its members, which it alleges it operated the same software protocol as bZeroX after it was passed control of it, and thus “violating the same laws as the respondents.”

The enforcement action has drawn the ire of a number of crypto lawyers and even a CFTC commissioner with concerns it will set an unfair regulatory precedent.

In a dissenting statement on Sept. 22, CFTC commissioner Summer Mersinger märkida that while she supports the CFTC’s charges against the bZeroX founders, the enforcement body is stepping into uncharted legal territory when taking action against DAO members that voted on governance proposals.

"Ma ei saa mitmel põhjusel nõustuda komisjoni lähenemisviisiga määrata DAO märgi omanike vastutus nende osalemise põhjal valitsemishääletuses."

"See lähenemisviis kujutab endast räiget "jõustamisega reguleerimist", kehtestades poliitika, mis põhineb uutel määratlustel ja standarditel, mida komisjon või selle töötajad pole kunagi varem sõnastanud ega avalikustatud," ütles ta.

Jake Chervinsky, lawyer and head of policy at the U.S. Blockchain Association on Twitter said the enforcement action “may be the most egregious example” of regulation by enforcement in the history of crypto, and drew comparisons between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the CTFC, noting that:

"Oleme pikalt kurtnud selle üle, et SEC seda taktikat kuritarvitab, kuid CFTC on nad häbi teinud."

Ka DeFi Haridusfond kellamäng in by noting that the CFTC’s charges also offer a gloomy prospect for people trying to innovate via DAOs.

Seotud: CFTC volinik külastab Ripple'i kontoreid, kuna SEC-i juhtum on lahendatud

“’Lawmaking via enforcement’ stifles innovation in the US, and today’s action will sadly further discourage any US person from not only developing but also *merely participating* in DAOs,” it wrote.

The list of charges include illegally offering retail leverage and margin trading; “engaging in activities only registered futures commission merchants (FCM) can perform;” and failing to incorporate a customer identification program under the Bank Secrecy Act.

CTFC märkis ka, et Bean ja Kistner märkisid, et nad soovivad bZeroX-i üle viia Ooki DAO-le, et vältida detsentraliseerimise halli ala alla surumist.

"Andes juhtimise üle DAO-le, reklaamisid bZeroX-i asutajad bZeroX-i kogukonna liikmetele, et toimingud oleksid jõustamiskindlad - võimaldades Ooki DAO-l karistamatult rikkuda CEA ja CFTC eeskirju," teatas CFTC.

Ajatempel:

Veel alates Cointelegraph