Hierarchical Generalization Of Dual Unitarity

Republished By Plato

Followers: 0

Xie-Hang Yu, Zhiyuan Wang, and Pavel Kos

Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Str. 1, 85748 Garching, Germany

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

Quantum dynamics with local interactions in lattice models display rich physics, but is notoriously hard to study. Dual-unitary circuits allow for exact answers to interesting physical questions in clean or disordered one- and higher-dimensional quantum systems. However, this family of models shows some non-universal features, like vanishing correlations inside the light-cone and instantaneous thermalization of local observables. In this work we propose a generalization of dual-unitary circuits where the exactly calculable spatial-temporal correlation functions display richer behavior, and have non-trivial thermalization of local observables. This is achieved by generalizing the single-gate condition to a hierarchy of multi-gate conditions, where the first level recovers dual-unitary models, and the second level exhibits these new interesting features. We also extend the discussion and provide exact solutions to correlators with few-site observables and discuss higher-orders, including the ones after a quantum quench. In addition, we provide exhaustive parametrizations for qubit cases, and propose a new family of models for local dimensions larger than two, which also provides a new family of dual-unitary models.

Hierarchical generalization of dual unitarity PlatoBlockchain Data Intelligence. Vertical Search. Ai.

Featured image: In this work, we consider quantum circuits with a hierarchy of conditions which relaxes the dual-unitary conditions. Each hierarchical condition involves more gates. It is still solvable and has richer physics.

Popular summary

The dynamics of extended systems with local interactions is the focal topic of research of different communities, such as statistical physics, condensed matter physics, quantum chaos, and high energy physics. The computational complexity of these dynamics necessitates the development of new solvable models to unravel many-body behaviors. Some of the most important models employed to this end are so-called dual-unitary circuits, which remain physical upon changing the roles of space and time. However, they still manifest certain non-universal features, including vanishing correlation functions inside the light cone and instantaneous thermalization of local observables.

To address these limitations, our work relaxes the dual-unitary condition into a hierarchy of conditions containing more and more gates where the dual-unitary circuit is the first level. Higher levels maintain a level of solvability and show more generic physical behavior. Thus our work paves the way for a deeper understanding of quantum chaotic dynamics and inspires the development of more intricate solvable models.

► BibTeX data

@article{Yu2024hierarchical, doi = {10.22331/q-2024-02-20-1260}, url = {https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-02-20-1260}, title = {Hierarchical generalization of dual unitarity}, author = {Yu, Xie-Hang and Wang, Zhiyuan and Kos, Pavel}, journal = {{Quantum}}, issn = {2521-327X}, publisher = {{Verein zur F{“{o}}rderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften}}, volume = {8}, pages = {1260}, month = feb, year = {2024}<br /> }

► References

[1] A J Daley, C Kollath, U Schollwöck, and G Vidal. “Time-dependent density-matrix renormalization-group using adaptive effective hilbert spaces”. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2004, P04005 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2004/04/P04005

[2] Norbert Schuch, Michael M. Wolf, Frank Verstraete, and J. Ignacio Cirac. “Entropy scaling and simulability by matrix product states”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 030504 (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.030504

[3] Marko Ljubotina, Lenart Zadnik, and Tomaz Prosen. “Ballistic spin transport in a periodically driven integrable quantum system”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 150605 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.150605

[4] Matthew P.A. Fisher, Vedika Khemani, Adam Nahum, and Sagar Vijay. “Random quantum circuits”. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 335–379 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031720-030658

[5] Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaž Prosen. “Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1+1 dimensions”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 210601 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.123.210601

[6] Lorenzo Piroli, Bruno Bertini, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Tomaz Prosen. “Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits”. Phys. Rev. B 101, 094304 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.101.094304

[7] Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaz Prosen. “Exact spectral form factor in a minimal model of many-body quantum chaos”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 264101 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.121.264101

[8] Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaž Prosen. “Random matrix spectral form factor of dual-unitary quantum circuits”. Communications in Mathematical Physics (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04139-2

[9] Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaž Prosen. “Entanglement spreading in a minimal model of maximal many-body quantum chaos”. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021033 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.9.021033

[10] Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaž Prosen. “Operator Entanglement in Local Quantum Circuits I: Chaotic Dual-Unitary Circuits”. SciPost Phys. 8, 67 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.4.067

[11] Sarang Gopalakrishnan and Austen Lamacraft. “Unitary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels”. Phys. Rev. B 100, 064309 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.100.064309

[12] Pieter W. Claeys and Austen Lamacraft. “Maximum velocity quantum circuits”. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033032 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033032

[13] Bruno Bertini and Lorenzo Piroli. “Scrambling in random unitary circuits: Exact results”. Phys. Rev. B 102, 064305 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.102.064305

[14] Isaac Reid and Bruno Bertini. “Entanglement barriers in dual-unitary circuits”. Phys. Rev. B 104, 014301 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.014301

[15] Tianci Zhou and Aram W. Harrow. “Maximal entanglement velocity implies dual unitarity”. Physical Review B 106 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.106.l201104

[16] Wen Wei Ho and Soonwon Choi. “Exact emergent quantum state designs from quantum chaotic dynamics”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.060601

[17] Pieter W. Claeys and Austen Lamacraft. “Emergent quantum state designs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dynamics”. Quantum 6, 738 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-06-15-738

[18] Matteo Ippoliti and Wen Wei Ho. “Dynamical purification and the emergence of quantum state designs from the projected ensemble”. PRX Quantum 4, 030322 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030322

[19] Felix Fritzsch and Tomaz Prosen. “Eigenstate thermalization in dual-unitary quantum circuits: Asymptotics of spectral functions”. Phys. Rev. E 103, 062133 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.062133

[20] Alessio Lerose, Michael Sonner, and Dmitry A. Abanin. “Influence matrix approach to many-body Floquet dynamics”. Phys. Rev. X 11, 021040 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021040

[21] Giacomo Giudice, Giuliano Giudici, Michael Sonner, Julian Thoenniss, Alessio Lerose, Dmitry A. Abanin, and Lorenzo Piroli. “Temporal entanglement, quasiparticles, and the role of interactions”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 220401 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.220401

[22] Alessandro Foligno, Tianci Zhou, and Bruno Bertini. “Temporal entanglement in chaotic quantum circuits”. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041008 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041008

[23] Matteo Ippoliti and Vedika Khemani. “Postselection-free entanglement dynamics via spacetime duality”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 060501 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.060501

[24] Matteo Ippoliti, Tibor Rakovszky, and Vedika Khemani. “Fractal, logarithmic, and volume-law entangled nonthermal steady states via spacetime duality”. Phys. Rev. X 12, 011045 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011045

[25] Tsung-Cheng Lu and Tarun Grover. “Spacetime duality between localization transitions and measurement-induced transitions”. PRX Quantum 2, 040319 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040319

[26] Ryotaro Suzuki, Kosuke Mitarai, and Keisuke Fujii. “Computational power of one-and two-dimensional dual-unitary quantum circuits”. Quantum 6, 631 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-01-24-631

[27] Eli Chertkov, Justin Bohnet, David Francois, John Gaebler, Dan Gresh, Aaron Hankin, Kenny Lee, David Hayes, Brian Neyenhuis, Russell Stutz, Andrew C. Potter, and Michael Foss-Feig. “Holographic dynamics simulations with a trapped-ion quantum computer”. Nature Physics 18, 1074–1079 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01689-7

[28] Xiao Mi, Pedram Roushan, Chris Quintana, Salvatore Mandrà, Jeffrey Marshall, Charles Neill, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Juan Atalaya, Ryan Babbush, Joseph C. Bardin, Rami Barends, Joao Basso, Andreas Bengtsson, Sergio Boixo, Alexandre Bourassa, Michael Broughton, Bob B. Buckley, David A. Buell, Brian Burkett, Nicholas Bushnell, Zijun Chen, Benjamin Chiaro, Roberto Collins, William Courtney, Sean Demura, Alan R. Derk, Andrew Dunsworth, Daniel Eppens, Catherine Erickson, Edward Farhi, Austin G. Fowler, Brooks Foxen, Craig Gidney, Marissa Giustina, Jonathan A. Gross, Matthew P. Harrigan, Sean D. Harrington, Jeremy Hilton, Alan Ho, Sabrina Hong, Trent Huang, William J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, Sergei V. Isakov, Evan Jeffrey, Zhang Jiang, Cody Jones, Dvir Kafri, Julian Kelly, Seon Kim, Alexei Kitaev, Paul V. Klimov, Alexander N. Korotkov, Fedor Kostritsa, David Landhuis, Pavel Laptev, Erik Lucero, Orion Martin, Jarrod R. McClean, Trevor McCourt, Matt McEwen, Anthony Megrant, Kevin C. Miao, Masoud Mohseni, Shirin Montazeri, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, Josh Mutus, Ofer Naaman, Matthew Neeley, Michael Newman, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Thomas E. O’Brien, Alex Opremcak, Eric Ostby, Balint Pato, Andre Petukhov, Nicholas Redd, Nicholas C. Rubin, Daniel Sank, Kevin J. Satzinger, Vladimir Shvarts, Doug Strain, Marco Szalay, Matthew D. Trevithick, Benjamin Villalonga, Theodore White, Z. Jamie Yao, Ping Yeh, Adam Zalcman, Hartmut Neven, Igor Aleiner, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Vadim Smelyanskiy, and Yu Chen. “Information scrambling in quantum circuits”. Science 374, 1479–1483 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg5029

[29] Suhail Ahmad Rather, S. Aravinda, and Arul Lakshminarayan. “Creating ensembles of dual unitary and maximally entangling quantum evolutions”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070501 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.070501

[30] Boris Gutkin, Petr Braun, Maram Akila, Daniel Waltner, and Thomas Guhr. “Exact local correlations in kicked chains”. Phys. Rev. B 102, 174307 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.174307

[31] Pieter W. Claeys and Austen Lamacraft. “Ergodic and nonergodic dual-unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local Hilbert space dimension”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 100603 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.126.100603

[32] S. Aravinda, Suhail Ahmad Rather, and Arul Lakshminarayan. “From dual-unitary to quantum Bernoulli circuits: Role of the entangling power in constructing a quantum ergodic hierarchy”. Phys. Rev. Research 3, 043034 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043034

[33] Tomaz Prosen. “Many-body quantum chaos and dual-unitarity round-a-face”. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 31, 093101 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0056970

[34] Márton Borsi and Balázs Pozsgay. “Construction and the ergodicity properties of dual unitary quantum circuits”. Phys. Rev. B 106, 014302 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.014302

[35] Márton Mestyán, Balázs Pozsgay, and Ian M. Wanless. “Multi-directional unitarity and maximal entanglement in spatially symmetric quantum states”. SciPost Phys. 16, 010 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.1.010

[36] Pieter W. Claeys, Austen Lamacraft, and Jamie Vicary. “From dual-unitary to biunitary: a 2-categorical model for exactly-solvable many-body quantum dynamics” (2023). arXiv:2302.07280.
arXiv:2302.07280

[37] Pavel Kos, Bruno Bertini, and Tomaz Prosen. “Correlations in perturbed dual-unitary circuits: Efficient path-integral formula”. Phys. Rev. X 11, 011022 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.11.011022

[38] Michael A. Rampp, Roderich Moessner, and Pieter W. Claeys. “From dual unitarity to generic quantum operator spreading”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 130402 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.130402

[39] Cheryne Jonay, Vedika Khemani, and Matteo Ippoliti. “Triunitary quantum circuits”. Phys. Rev. Research 3, 043046 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043046

[40] Richard M. Milbradt, Lisa Scheller, Christopher Aßmus, and Christian B. Mendl. “Ternary unitary quantum lattice models and circuits in $2+1$ dimensions”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 090601 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.090601

[41] Yusuf Kasim and Tomaz Prosen. “Dual unitary circuits in random geometries”. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 56, 025003 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/acb1e0

[42] Lluis Masanes. “Discrete holography in dual-unitary circuits” (2023). arXiv:2301.02825.
arXiv:2301.02825

[43] Pavel Kos and Georgios Styliaris. “Circuits of space and time quantum channels”. Quantum 7, 1020 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-05-24-1020

[44] Alexios Christopoulos, Andrea De Luca, D L Kovrizhin, and Tomaz Prosen. “Dual symplectic classical circuits: An exactly solvable model of many-body chaos” (2023). arXiv:2307.01786.
arXiv:2307.01786

[45] Jon E Tyson. “Operator-schmidt decompositions and the fourier transform, with applications to the operator-schmidt numbers of unitaries”. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 36, 10101 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/36/39/309

[46] Marko Medenjak, Katja Klobas, and Tomaž Prosen. “Diffusion in deterministic interacting lattice systems”. Physical Review Letters 119 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.119.110603

[47] Katja Klobas, Marko Medenjak, Tomaž Prosen, and Matthieu Vanicat. “Time-dependent matrix product ansatz for interacting reversible dynamics”. Communications in Mathematical Physics 371, 651–688 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03494-5

[48] Katja Klobas and Bruno Bertini. “Exact relaxation to gibbs and non-equilibrium steady states in the quantum cellular automaton rule 54”. SciPost Physics 11 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphys.11.6.106

[49] Katja Klobas, Cecilia De Fazio, and Juan P. Garrahan. “Exact “hydrophobicity” in deterministic circuits: dynamical fluctuations in the floquet-east model” (2023). arXiv:2305.07423.
arXiv:2305.07423

[50] Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaz Prosen. “Localised dynamics in the floquet quantum east model” (2023). arXiv:2306.12467.
arXiv:2306.12467

[51] Katja Klobas, Bruno Bertini, and Lorenzo Piroli. “Exact thermalization dynamics in the “rule 54” quantum cellular automaton”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 160602 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.160602

[52] Alessandro Foligno, Katja Klobas, and Bruno Bertini. “In preparation” (2023).

Cited by

[1] Chuan Liu and Wen Wei Ho, “Solvable entanglement dynamics in quantum circuits with generalized dual unitarity”, arXiv:2312.12239, (2023).

[2] Alessandro Foligno, Pavel Kos, and Bruno Bertini, “Quantum information spreading in generalised dual-unitary circuits”, arXiv:2312.02940, (2023).

[3] Bruno Bertini, Cecilia De Fazio, Juan P. Garrahan, and Katja Klobas, “Exact quench dynamics of the Floquet quantum East model at the deterministic point”, arXiv:2310.06128, (2023).

[4] Tom Holden-Dye, Lluis Masanes, and Arijeet Pal, “Fundamental charges for dual-unitary circuits”, arXiv:2312.14148, (2023).

[5] Suhail Ahmad Rather, “Construction of perfect tensors using biunimodular vectors”, arXiv:2309.01504, (2023).

[6] Michael A. Rampp, Suhail A. Rather, and Pieter W. Claeys, “The entanglement membrane in exactly solvable lattice models”, arXiv:2312.12509, (2023).

The above citations are from SAO/NASA ADS (last updated successfully 2024-02-20 14:52:04). The list may be incomplete as not all publishers provide suitable and complete citation data.

Could not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2024-02-20 14:52:03: Could not fetch cited-by data for 10.22331/q-2024-02-20-1260 from Crossref. This is normal if the DOI was registered recently.

This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.

SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
Source: https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2024-02-20-1260/

Time Stamp: February 20, 2024

Time Stamp: Mar 2, 2023

Coherent feedback in optomechanical systems in the sideband-unresolved regime

Source Cluster:

Quantum Journal

Source Node: 1735195

Time Stamp: Nov 3, 2022

Quantum Encoding and Analysis on Continuous Time Stochastic Process with Financial Applications

Source Cluster:

Quantum Journal

Source Node: 1897890

Time Stamp: Oct 3, 2023

Experimental Semi-quantum Key Distribution With Classical Users

Source Cluster:

Quantum Journal

Source Node: 1678328

Time Stamp: Sep 22, 2022

Solvable model of deep thermalization with distinct design times

Source Cluster:

Quantum Journal

Source Node: 1780036

Time Stamp: Dec 29, 2022

Hierarchical generalization of dual unitarity

Republished By Plato

Abstract

Popular summary

► BibTeX data

► References

Cited by

More from Quantum Journal

Emergent quantum state designs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dynamics

Finite Rate QLDPC-GKP Coding Scheme that Surpasses the CSS Hamming Bound

A rapidly mixing Markov chain from any gapped quantum many-body system

Improved DIQKD protocols with finite-size analysis

Coherent feedback in optomechanical systems in the sideband-unresolved regime

Quantum Encoding and Analysis on Continuous Time Stochastic Process with Financial Applications

Experimental Semi-quantum Key Distribution With Classical Users

Solvable model of deep thermalization with distinct design times

About Us

Vertical Search & Ai

Platform

Stay Connected

Account