Each dramatically new expertise, from cryptocurrency to drones to synthetic intelligence, poses a regulatory problem. Governments should resolve the best way to characterize the expertise inside current legal guidelines, how these current legal guidelines apply and to what extent new tech requires new authorized restrictions. Governments can take motion in quite a lot of methods: by way of new laws, by revising laws and different insurance policies below current legislation, or by way of litigation. Many nationwide governments and worldwide our bodies are having precisely this dialog as to the metaverse, with important potential ramifications for metaverse corporations, their enterprise companions and finish customers.
EU
On Sept. 14, 2022, Thierry Breton, the European Union’s Commissioner for the Inside Market, printed “Ljudje, tehnologije in infrastruktura – evropski načrt za uspeh v metaverzumu.” Partially, Breton signaled confidence in current legislation on metaverse points, noting that “With the Digital Services Act (DSA) and Digital Markets Act (DMA), Europe has now strong and future-proof regulatory tools for the digital space.” However the commissioner additionally clearly indicated that the work of regulating the metaverse is simply beginning, asserting the launch of the Digital and Augmented Actuality Industrial Coalition, “bringing together stakeholders from key metaverse technologies” to develop a roadmap for additional growth. Breton confused security and competitors issues, promising that “we will not witness a new Wild West or new private monopolies.”
Južna Koreja
South Korea’s Nationwide Information Coverage Committee introduced on Sept. 23, 2022, that it could razviti regulativne spremembe, specifične za metaverzum. Odboru predseduje južnokorejski premier Han Duck-soo, soupravljajo pa ga ministri za znanost in IKT ter minister za notranje zadeve in varnost.
The announcement targeted on the metaverse as a problem that might “lead the success of national competitiveness.” The Committee discovered particularly that the South Korean framework that exists for videogaming was inadequate to cope with metaverse points. Earlier within the week, Vice Chairman of the Korea Communications Fee, Ahn Hyoung-hwan, met with a metaverse platform supplier to debate rising issues over South Korean minors podvržen spolnemu nadlegovanju na platformah metaverse.
Japonska
Earlier this 12 months, Japan introduced creation of a Net 3.0 Coverage Workplace below the Ministry of Economic system, Commerce and Business (METI) to oblikovati politike, povezane z metaverse. Ministrstvo je znano, da »ko metaverzi postajajo novi osebni vmesniki, zlasti med mlajšimi generacijami, kot je generacija Z, bi digitalni prostori in sredstva lahko postali veliko pomembnejši« in da bi lahko tudi podjetniki Net 3.0 zapuščali državo zaradi manj reguliranih odločitev.
ZDA
In america, essentially the most direct regulatory assertion on the metaverse has come within the context of the Federal Commerce Fee’s lawsuit to blokirati Metin nakup priljubljene aplikacije metaverse. Per the FTC, “The virtual reality industry offers a uniquely immersive digital experience and is characterized by a high degree of growth and innovation,” however that Meta’s drive to “conquer virtual reality” posed a risk to competitors. “Meta, the global technology behemoth that owns Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp, is the largest provider of virtual reality devices, and also a leading provider of apps in the U.S.” The FTC claims that by buying the health app, Meta discouraged anybody else from creating such an app, dampening future innovation and aggressive rivalry.
Whether or not by implementing and increasing current legal guidelines or growing new laws, or by way of the smooth regulation of insurance policies and pointers, the growing metaverse will proceed to occupy a central place in authorities discussions all over the world.
Povezava na vir
#South #Korea #Japan #Announce #Metaverse #Regulation #Plans #Holland #Knight #LLP
