The Darkest Phase Of The Bear

Ponovno objavil Platon

Spremljevalci: 0

Najtemnejša faza medveda

Bitcoin in digitalna sredstva so doživela še en kaotičen teden padajočih cen, pri čemer so izgubili odprto vrednost 31,693 $ in trgovali na novo večletno najnižjo vrednost 25,150 $. Makro nasprotni vetrovi ostajajo obsežno gonilo, pri čemer je najnovejši odtis CPI v ZDA 8.6 % nad pričakovanji, v ponedeljek v zgodnjih urah pa se je zgodila še ena inverzija krivulje donosa ameriških državnih obveznic za 2-10 let. To se je srečalo z velikim dvigom DXY, saj se Bitcoin zaključi s svojo 10. rdečo svečo v 11 tednih.

Pripomoček omrežja Bitcoin še naprej upada, pri čemer makrometrike, kot je RVT, vstopajo na neznano medvedje območje. Kljub nenehnemu kopičenju tako pri kozicah (< 1BTC) kot pri kitih (> 10k BTC), cenovna podpora še zdaleč ni vzpostavljena. Kljub številnim meritvam makro vrednotenja, ki še naprej označujejo pogoje preprodanosti, Bitcoin ostaja povezan s tradicionalnimi trgi, pri čemer cene ustrezno premagajo.

V tej izdaji raziskujemo, kako trenutni medvedji trg zdaj vstopa v fazo, ki je usklajena z najglobljimi in najtemnejšimi fazami prejšnjih medvedov. Trg je v povprečju komaj nad svojo stroškovno osnovo in celo dolgoročni imetniki so zdaj očiščeni iz baze imetnikov.

Prevodi

Ta teden se On-chain zdaj prevaja v španski, Italijanski, Chinese, Japonski, turški, francosko, portugalski, Farsi, poljski, hebrejščina in Grški.

Nadzorna plošča Week Onchain

Glasilo Week Onchain ima nadzorno ploščo v živo z vsemi predstavljenimi grafikoni na voljo tukaj. This dashboard and all covered metrics are explored further in our Video Report, which is released on Tuesdays each week. Visit and subscribe to our Youtube Channel, in obiščite našo Video portal za več video vsebin in vadnic o meritvah.

A Meeting With The Cost Basis

With the market trading into the mid-$20k region, it is approaching one of the most significant and fundamental on-chain metrics, the Realized Price. This metric represents the average price of every coin in the supply, valued at the time it was last spent on-chain.

The Realized Price (at $23,430) is rarely visited by spot prices outside the deepest and latest stages of bear markets. March 2020, and the end of the 2018 bear market were the last instances where the market was on aggregate holding an unrealized loss.

The MVRV Z-Score then compares this spot value of Bitcoin against Realized Price to obtain an oscillator. This tool can help to identify statistically meaningful deviations away from this ‘intrinsic value’ and is used to assess over and undervalued conditions.

Values equal to the mean (black line) typically align with these deep late stage bears. The current market has now fallen to just +0.26 standard deviations above the mean, which historically would be considered a value zone, especially so when weighted for an upwards drift in Z-score.

Nevertheless, past bear cycles have shown that negative MVRV-Z values are often seen before a bear market concludes and can persist in that state for some time (order of months in 2018 to a year IN 2015).

Bitcoin HODLers Soften Up

Within the structural downtrend that has been in place since November, we have seen a variety of behavioural phases and Bitcoin spending behaviour taking place. We can use these changes in behaviour to gauge how aggregated investor sentiment has changed.

O Ocena trenda akumulacije is a useful tool to observe these changes by assessing the magnitude and duration of on-chain Bitcoin balance growth or contraction. It displays the aggregate accumulation/distribution weighted for all cohorts.

Od decembra 2020 do januarja 2021 – Bull market buying, as investors entered the market and created the bullish impulse to the then $64k ATH.
Jan 2021 to Oct 2021 – Softening and general distribution, in part a result of declining spot demand after the GBTC premium turned to a discount (covered in our report here)
Od oktobra 2021 do januarja 2022 – Post ATH buying demand which was later redistributed (as covered in Week 9, 2022)
Jan 2022 to May 2022 – Intermittent accumulation and distribution, culminating in the LUNA-UST motivated sell-off (as covered in 20. teden 2022).

In the current market, we have seen one month with an Accumulation Trend Score north of 0.8, signifying high positive balance changes across the market. This is a notable shift from the intermittent accumulation before the LUNA sell-off and may suggest an improved investor perception of value at prices at and below $30k.

We can also look toward the Živahnost metric to understand the market preference for HODLing or distributional behaviour. Liveliness defines the balance between aggregate Coin Day Destruction and Coin Day Creation. It can therefore be used to provide confluence with destruction and accumulation regimes.

Liveliness has remained in a structural downtrend since August 21. Bitcoin is firmly within a regime of aggregate Coin Day Creation as HODLing dominates. However, as we have explored in previous editions, with only the HODLer class remaining, their demand side remains too light to contain the current action sell-side.

We can further confirm this by assessing the 3-month position change for Liveliness (shown in purple below). A general accumulation range can also be highlighted since the Great Miner Migration in Jul 2021. However, this Coin Day Creation regime is losing momentum and trending toward an equilibrium position based on the current trend. This reflects the general uncertainty in markets, which is resulting in increased investor de-risking of spot positions.

The HODLer net position change brings these observations into the supply domain, and can be used to estimate the magnitude of coin volume HODLer base is accumulating or distributing. This metric indicates that based on the degree of coin dormancy at present, approximately 15k-20k BTC per month are transitioning into the hands of Bitcoin HODLers. This has declined by around 64% since early May, suggesting a weakening accumulation response.

We have seen changing phases of investor conviction and spending behaviour over the last 18-months. In particular, we have identified that in both instances at the $30k level (May-July 2021 and currently), the investor buy-side sentiment appears to be stronger than any other price level in this cycle.

A Bifurcated Market

We have established that investors do appear to perceive value in the sub-$30k region, despite this demand being insufficient thus far in providing price support. Next will break down which cohorts have been participating in the accumulation to further refine these observations.

The Trend Accumulation Score by Cohort allows a more granular assessment into which wallet-size cohorts are accumulating/distributing and to what degree.

Shrimps (<1 BTC) and Whales (>10k BTC, excl. exchanges and miners) cohorts have been aggressively accumulating since the price slump into the $25k-$32k range. This remains in effect throughout the last 2 months of depressed prices.
Crabs to Sharks (1 to 100 BTC) cohorts have transitioned from a neutral to a distributive phase during the current sell-off. This suggests a potential decline in confidence.

Thus the near-perfect scores of 0.9+ seen in the Accumulation Trend Score over recent weeks are being driven by the very large (>10k BTC) and relatively small (<1 BTC) cohorts. It is interesting to note that the whale entities were the driving distributors at the $45k to $35k levels (Zone A) and are currently one of the prime accumulators in the $25k to $32k range (Zone B).

Next, we can assess the 30-day rate of change of supply held by shrimp addresses with less than 1 BTC. The 30-day rate of change provides insight into the raw position change to the number of coins held by this smaller and likely retail-level cohort of investors.

Although the current rate of balance growth is waning, it was preceded by the most aggressive and consistent accumulation period post-Bitcoin’s initial rise in the last 18-months. These smallholders have seen a net balance growth of +20,863 Bitcoin since the May 9th Luna crash, providing confluence with Accumulation Trend Score by Cohort.

On an absolute magnitude basis, Shrimps have added +96.3k BTC to their holdings since the Nov ATH. This equates to 0.451% of the circulating supply, and 48.6% of new coin issuance over the same period.

We can visibly see the steepening positive gradient of shrimp owned supply. These small holders appear unfazed, rightly or wrongly, by the prevailing downtrend, as they continue to constantly accumulate spot BTC.

The other cohort of interest to assess is the 10k+ BTC Whale cohort. Looking at the monthly position change of their addresses, we can support our previous observations that the cohort has also been accumulating throughout the $25k-$32k price range. This cohort has a monthly position change peak of ~140k BTC/month, increasing their balance by adding +306,358 BTC since the Nov 2021 ATH.

The Entity-Adjusted Unspent Realized Price Distribution by wallet cohort examines the price points where this supply distribution was last transacted, and by which wallet cohort.

Around the $30k and $40k price buckets, we can see significant supply clusters associated with a diverse range of wallet cohorts, indicating these two price ranges experienced significant volumes of supply changing hands. However, there is little coin volume transacted between $27k and $20k, which may manifest as a region of high volatility, and potentially little support.

The Deterioration of Fundamentals

O RVT Ratio compares the Realized Capitalization against the daily volume settled On-Chain, this provides insight into the daily utilization of the network (On-Chain volume) relative to its intrinsic value (Realized Cap). A general framework for the interpretation of the RVT is:

High values and uptrends indicate poor utilization and a slow-down in-network utilization.
Low values and downtrends indicate high utilization and an uptick in-network utilization.
Stable sideways values indicate that the current utilization trend is likely sustainable and in equilibrium.

The red band denotes an RVT ratio of 80 or above, suggesting the network valuation is now 80 times larger than the daily value settled. This is indicative of a barren on-chain activity landscape, which is historically a result of extended bearish price action, flushing cost-sensitive participants from the network.

In past bear cycles, an underutilized network has provided confluence with bear market bottoms. Should network utilization increase and RVT manages to break lower, it may signal improving fundamentals. However, with the RVT ratio currently at its highest value since 2010, a continued break higher would enter the somewhat uncharted bearish territory, where network valuation is even more 'overvalued' relative to network activity.

The Entity Adjusted Dormancy Flow model can also be used to compare Market Valuation to network utilization from the perspective of the average coin age being spent in the network. Dormancy measures the average amount of Coin Days Destroyed on a per coin transacted basis. Dormancy Flow then compares the Market Capitalisation to Dormancy (in USD terms), thus capturing deviations in spending behaviour against the market valuation.

Dormancy Flow continues to trade at historical lows, suggesting that the market valuation is low relative to the time weighted on-chain transaction volume. Previous instances of Dormancy flow at these levels have typically coincided with bear market capitulation events and periods of maximum pain.

In line with the weakening Liveliness and HODLer performance, this aligns with a condition where even the oldest Bitcoin holders were purged from the network.

A Purging Of Even the Strongest Hands

Long Term Holders and Short Term Holders are dichotomous by nature and thus value different things.

Short Term Holders are statistically more sensitive to price volatility, as their cost basis is much closer to the current spot price.
Dolgoročni imetniki generally represent the HODLer cohort, whom are relatively price-insensitive. This cohort is more likely to weather volatility and price drawdowns in the pursuit of long term value (covered in last weeks edition).

O Spent Price is a model that represents the average cost basis of coins that were spent each day. This can be split to analyze the LTH and STH components to identify divergences between their spending behaviours. It is uncommon for the LTH cohort to spend coins with a higher average cost basis than their sister STH cohort, however this does occur when entering a deep capitulation zone, where even the strongest hands are purged from the asset.

The chart below compares the spent price of LTH to STH, and we can see that LTHs are currently spending coins with a higher cost basis than STHs. Previous instances of this have coincided with deep bear market finales, lasting between 52-days (2020) and 514-days (2014-15) and accompanied by additional drawdowns in the price of -40% to -65%.

Comparing the aggregate market cost basis (Realized Price) to the LTH-Cost Basis shows that the two are currently converging. The LTH cohort usually has the lowest On-Chain cost basis, and this directly ties in with their trading ideology of buying low prices in value zones thus, their aggregate purchase is lower.

Therefore, with the LTH cost basis approaching the aggregate cost basis (from below), it is an indication that the current holdings of the 'smart money' cohort have not outcome the broader market. Previous instances where LTH Realized Price is higher than aggregate Realized Price also coincide with the deepest phases of a bear market.

Povzetek in sklepi

The Bitcoin market has entered a phase coincident with the deepest and darkest bear cycles of the past. Prices barely hold above the aggregate cost basis as captured by the Realized price, and on-chain volume fundamentals have deteriorated further. Historically, this phase has taken on the order of 8 to 24 months to pass by as the market hammers out a final bottom.

Of the highest note is that Long-Term holders are currently spending coins with a higher cost basis than Short-Term holders, and their cost basis is barely more profitable than the aggregate market. In the past, this has signalled the start of the final and painful wash-out phase of all remaining sellers, unfortunately, accompanied by a further 40% to 64% price decline.

All eyes are on the conviction and support provided by the Bitcoin HODLer class now.

Posodobitve izdelka

Vse posodobitve izdelkov, izboljšave in ročne posodobitve meritev in podatkov so zabeležene v naš dnevnik sprememb za vaše reference.

Izdaja novo nadzorno ploščo za profesionalne uporabnike: strojnica GN
Dodano 5y zoom option to dashboards metrics cards.
Improvements applied to Workbench if Funkcija.
Poenostavljeno save actions on the Workbench page and added on-click Price možnost.
17. izdaja glasila Uncharted sproščeno.

Sledite nam in se oglasite Twitter
Pridružite se naši Telegram kanal
obisk Forum Glassnode za dolgotrajne razprave in analize.
Za meritve v verigi in grafe dejavnosti obiščite Studio Glassnode
Za avtomatizirana opozorila o osnovnih meritvah v verigi in dejavnosti na borzah obiščite našo Glassnode opozarja Twitter

Omejitev odgovornosti: To poročilo ne vsebuje nobenega svetovanja glede naložb. Vsi podatki so na voljo samo v informativne namene. Nobena odločitev o naložbi ne sme temeljiti na informacijah, navedenih tukaj, vi pa ste sami odgovorni za svoje odločitve o naložbah.

Časovni žig: Junij 13, 2022

Časovni žig: Maj 31, 2021

Ponovno objavil Platon

Krótka zgodovina univerze Ethereum

Apresentando kot Métricas de Prova-de-Reserva das Corretoras

Tržni utrip: Stakerji ETH 2.0 so pod vodo

O nas

Navpično iskanje in Ai

Platforma

Ostanite povezani

Račun