رشتہ دار کوانٹم میکانکس کے متعلقہ حقائق کوانٹم میکانکس سے مطابقت نہیں رکھتے

رشتہ دار کوانٹم میکانکس کے متعلقہ حقائق کوانٹم میکانکس سے مطابقت نہیں رکھتے

Relative Facts of Relational Quantum Mechanics are Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics PlatoBlockchain Data Intelligence. Vertical Search. Ai.

Jay Lawrence1, Marcin Markiewicz2, and Marek Żukowski2

1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
2بین الاقوامی مرکز برائے تھیوری آف کوانٹم ٹیکنالوجیز (ICTQT)، یونیورسٹی آف گڈانسک، 80-308 گڈانسک، پولینڈ

اس کاغذ کو دلچسپ لگتا ہے یا اس پر بات کرنا چاہتے ہیں؟ SciRate پر تبصرہ کریں یا چھوڑیں۔.

خلاصہ

Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) claims to be an interpretation of quantum theory [20]. However, there are significant departures from quantum theory: (i) in RQM measurement outcomes arise from interactions which entangle a system $S$ and an observer $A$ without decoherence, and (ii) such an outcome is a “fact” relative to the observer $A$, but it is not a fact relative to another observer $B$ who has not interacted with $S$ or $A$ during the foregoing measurement process. For $B$ the system $S otimes A$ remains entangled. We derive a GHZ-like contradiction showing that relative facts described by these statements are incompatible with quantum theory. Hence Relational Quantum Mechanics should not be considered an interpretation of quantum theory, according to a criterion for interpretations that we have introduced. The criterion states that whenever an interpretation introduces a notion of outcomes, these outcomes, whatever they are, must follow the probability distribution specified by the Born rule.

► BibTeX ڈیٹا

► حوالہ جات

ہے [1] Adlam, Emily (2021), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Elements in the Philosophy of Physics (Cambridge University Press).
https://​doi.org/​10.1017/​9781108885515

ہے [2] Adlam, Emily, and Carlo Rovelli (2022), “Information is physical: Cross-perspective links in relational quantum mechanics,” 10.48550/​ARXIV.2203.13342.
https://​doi.org/​10.48550/​ARXIV.2203.13342

ہے [3] Brukner, Časlav (2022), “Wigner’s friend and relational objectivity,” Nature Reviews Physics 4 (10), 628–630.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s42254-022-00505-8

ہے [4] Brukner, Časlav (2018), “A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts,” Entropy 20 (5), 10.3390/​e20050350.
https://​doi.org/​10.3390/​e20050350

ہے [5] Cabello, Adán (2017), “Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness,” in What is Quantum Information?, edited by Olimpia Lombardi, Sebastian Fortin, Federico Holik, and Cristian López (Cambridge University Press) p. 138–144.
https://​doi.org/​10.1017/​9781316494233.009

ہے [6] Cavalcanti, Eric G (2021), “The view from a Wigner Bubble,” Foundations of Physics 51 (2), 39.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s10701-021-00417-0

ہے [7] Deutsch, David (1985), “Quantum theory as a universal physical theory,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24 (1), 1–41.
https://​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF00670071

ہے [8] Di Biagio, Andrea, and Carlo Rovelli (2022), “Relational quantum mechanics is about facts, not states: A reply to Pienaar and Brukner,” Foundations of Physics 52 (3), 62.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s10701-022-00579-5

ہے [9] Frauchiger, Daniela, and Renato Renner (2018), “Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself,” Nature Communications 9 (1), 3711.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41467-018-05739-8

ہے [10] Greenberger, Daniel M, Michael A. Horne, and Anton Zeilinger (1989), “Going Beyond Bell’s Theorem,” in Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, edited by Menas Kafatos (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht) pp. 69–72.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-94-017-0849-4_10

ہے [11] Haake, Fritz, and Marek Żukowski (1993), “Classical motion of meter variables in the quantum theory of measurement,” Phys. Rev. A 47, 2506–2517.
https://​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.47.2506

ہے [12] Ma, Xiao-song, Johannes Kofler, and Anton Zeilinger (2016), “Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015005.
https://​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.88.015005

ہے [13] Mermin, N David (1990), “Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373–3376.
https://​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.65.3373

ہے [14] Miller, W. A., and J. A. Wheeler (1984), “Delayed-choice experiments and Bohr’s elementary quantum phenomenon,” in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the light of New Technology, edited by S. Kamefuchi et al. (eds.) (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo).

ہے [15] von Neumann, John (1955), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.).

ہے [16] Nurgalieva, Nuriya, and Renato Renner (2020), “Testing quantum theory with thought experiments,” Contemporary Physics 61 (3), 193–216.
https://​doi.org/​10.1080/​00107514.2021.1880075

ہے [17] Pienaar, Jacques (2021a), “QBism and relational quantum mechanics compared,” Foundations of Physics 51 (5), 96.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s10701-021-00501-5

ہے [18] Pienaar, Jacques (2021b), “A quintet of quandaries: Five no-go theorems for relational quantum mechanics,” Foundations of Physics 51 (5), 97.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s10701-021-00500-6

ہے [19] Rovelli, Carlo (1996), “Relational quantum mechanics,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35 (8), 1637–1678.
https://​doi.org/​10.1007/​BF02302261

ہے [20] Rovelli, Carlo (2022), “The relational interpretation,” in Oxford Handbook of the History of Interpretation of Quantum Physics, edited by Olival Freire Jr et al. (Oxford University Press) pp. 1055–1072.

ہے [21] Schlosshauer, Maximilian (2005), “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1267–1305.
https://​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.76.1267

ہے [22] Schlosshauer, Maximilian (2019), “Quantum decoherence,” Physics Reports 831, 1–57.
https://​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.physrep.2019.10.001

ہے [23] Wheeler, John Archibald, and Wojciech Hubert Zurek, Eds. (1983), Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

ہے [24] Wigner, Eugene Paul (1995), “Remarks on the mind-body question,” in Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses, edited by Jagdish Mehra (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg) pp. 247–260.
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-642-78374-6_20

ہے [25] Żukowski, Marek, and Marcin Markiewicz (2021), “Physics and metaphysics of Wigner’s friends: Even performed premeasurements have no results,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 130402.
https://​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.126.130402

ہے [26] Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (1982), “Environment-induced superselection rules,” Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862–1880.
https://​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevD.26.1862

ہے [27] Zurek, Wojciech Hubert (2022), “Quantum theory of the classical: Einselection, envariance, quantum darwinism and extantons,” Entropy 24 (11), 1520.
https://​doi.org/​10.3390/​e24111520

کی طرف سے حوالہ دیا گیا

[1] Eric G. Cavalcanti, Andrea Di Biagio, and Carlo Rovelli, “On the consistency of relative facts”, آر ایکس سی: 2305.07343, (2023).

[2] مارٹن بوجووالڈ اور آرٹر سوبنجان، "کوانٹم ریفرنس فریم کی الجبری خصوصیات: کیا وقت میں اتار چڑھاؤ آتا ہے؟"، آر ایکس سی: 2211.04520, (2022).

[3] Aurélien Drezet, “(Once more) In defense of Relational Quantum Mechanics: A note on `Relative facts do not exist. Relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics'”, آر ایکس سی: 2209.01237, (2022).

[4] Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz, and Marek Żukowski, “Relative facts do not exist. Relational Quantum Mechanics is Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Response to the critique by Aurélien Drezet”, آر ایکس سی: 2210.09025, (2022).

[5] Aurélien Drezet, “Can a Bohmian be a Rovellian for all practical purposes?”, فزکس کی بنیادیں 53 1, 30 (2023).

مذکورہ بالا اقتباسات سے ہیں۔ SAO/NASA ADS (آخری بار کامیابی کے ساتھ 2023-05-27 00:05:11)۔ فہرست نامکمل ہو سکتی ہے کیونکہ تمام ناشرین مناسب اور مکمل حوالہ ڈیٹا فراہم نہیں کرتے ہیں۔

On Crossref کی طرف سے پیش خدمت کاموں کے حوالے سے کوئی ڈیٹا نہیں ملا (آخری کوشش 2023-05-27 00:05:10)۔

ٹائم اسٹیمپ:

سے زیادہ کوانٹم جرنل