Acesta este un extras din Build for Tomorrow by Jason Feifer (Harmony Books, September 2022).
Amy Orben wanted to answer a very modern question: How do digital connections compare with other forms of connection?
It’s the kind of thing only a wonky, hyperanalytic person would think to ask. Orben is that person. She received a master’s in natural science from the University of Cambridge, and then went to the University of Oxford for a doctorate in experimental psychology. This is a woman who knows how to quantify the world around her and then navigate the numbers.
In 2017, she needed a compelling thesis project related to how digital technologies impact social connections. At the time, the world was still having a big panic about social media’s impact on young people’s mental health. Orben thought this was the perfect opportunity. She could investigate these big, important subjects that were grabbing headlines around the world, and hopefully come away with insights that could help improve lives. “It felt so urgent,” she told me. “It felt like every minute mattered.”
For the next few years, this is what she devoted her attention to. Eventually she thought it would be fun to kick her paper off with a historical anecdote — something that contextualized the danger of social media. She went to the library and came across a 1941 article in Jurnalul de Pediatrie, which warned about the dangers of radio.
“The average child radio addict starts lapping up his fascinating crime at about 4 o’clock in the afternoon and continues for much of the time until sent to bed,” wrote the author, a doctor named Mary Preston. “The spoiled children listen until around 10 o’clock; the less indulged until around 9 o’clock.”
The report concluded that more than half of children had become addicted to radio dramas.
Orben was stunned. “It felt like it was exactly the same conversation I’ve been having for three years — just, you know, eighty years before,” she said.
She’d been investigating how social media impacts children’s mental health, thinking it was an original question about technological change. Now she knew it was actually an neoriginal question that’s posed about Orice technological change. Was she just part of a cycle that repeated itself over and over? Orben started looking back at her research — and all the other studies she’d found on social media — but now with this new lens. She re-analyzed the data from past studies — studies that had gotten a lot of attention over the years, and that had been used as the foundation for many books and articles and political hand-wringing. The results were alarmingly clear.
“The research was flawed,” she said. “They didn’t really tell us a lot about whether there’s a causal impact of social media on depression. We’re all talking about corelații — and they’re very, very small.”
Panic vs. Data
After running the numbers on this deeper and more sophisticated analysis, Orben was able to compare how different activities relate to well-being, as a way to understand whether social media is really having a large and important impact. In actuality, technology alone has an insubstantial effect on young people’s psychological well-being. Scientific American succinctly summed up her results: “Technology use tilts the needle less than half a percent away from feeling emotionally sound. For context, eating potatoes is associated with nearly the same degree of effect and wearing glasses has a more negative impact on adolescent mental health.” Eating potatoes!
Many other studies have since reached similar conclusions. Soon Orben got to wondering: Why did this misunderstanding happen at all?
In answering that question, she came up with a four-step theory she calls il Sisyphean Cycle of Technology Panics. Sisyphus: He’s the guy from Greek mythology who was doomed to roll a boulder up a hill, only to have the boulder roll back down, and then have to do it repeatedly for eternity. You can see why this makes for a tidy metaphor.
Step 1: Something seems different
A new technology is introduced, and its adoption starts to change the behavior of people seen as vulnerable, like children. Then that change becomes linked to whatever large, abstract concern is already floating around in society.
Step 2: Politicians get involved
Politicians love a good moral panic, because they make complex problems appear simple. Nobody wants to address the structural inequality that may be causing it — that requires blaming voters, and examining a politicians’ own policies, and then making difficult and lasting change.
Step 3: Scientists slam the gas
Science relies heavily upon grants, which has very real consequences over what kind of science gets done, because researchers begin lining up to study whichever subjects are in favor. And politicians do want answers acum. So researchers try to speed up their work. They tweet and talk to journalists and design studies that can move quickly.
Step 4: The low-information free-for-all
Once researchers release the results of their time-consuming studies, the media reports on them. Then politicians start acting on them. And then there’s chaos.
Cum să întrerupi ciclul panicilor tehnologice
Instead of being reactive, science should be proactive. If researchers need five years to truly begin understanding something, then that five-year process shouldn’t start while everyone’s all hyped up and politicians are demanding answers. It should start before anyone cares.
“If we know that a new panic is coming in maybe five or ten years,” Orben told me, “then what we should be doing now is putting our feelers out, and trying to figure out what that might be, and start collecting data.”
Orben isn’t saying that her peers must do better. She’s instead saying that her peers must recognize their weaknesses. In effect, she’s saying that she believes in the scientific process — but that, because it is slow and messy, the people who participate in it should factor those downsides into their work.
We can and should apply this to ourselves as well. We need a situational awareness of ourselves — a recognition of how we, as individuals and as groups, react negatively to new things. What did we once fear, that we now love? What did we learn in the process? Then we can build that knowledge into our actions.
It’s time to keep a record. The next time you surprise yourself by loving something you thought you’d hate, write it down. Memorialize it in a notebook, or on a Word doc, or just an email to yourself. It doesn’t matter. Describe why you didn’t want to do this thing, and then what happened after you did it, and how you feel now. Then store that piece of writing somewhere that you can easily find — because one day, I guarantee, the boulder you just rolled up a hill will roll back down, and you’ll be at the bottom, feeling lazy and defeated, and you will not want to push it back up. That’s when you need the reminder that you’ve been there before — but that there are great things on the other side of these feelings. All you need to do is say yes.
That’s when you break the Sisyphean Cycle. And you can begin to focus on what’s next.
Postat pe 17 august 2022
Tehnologie, inovație și viitor, așa cum au spus cei care o construiesc.
Opiniile exprimate în „postări” (inclusiv articole, podcasturi, videoclipuri și rețele sociale) sunt cele ale persoanelor citate în acestea și nu sunt neapărat opiniile AH Capital Management, LLC („a16z”) sau ale afiliaților săi respectivi. Anumite informații conținute aici au fost obținute din surse terțe, inclusiv de la companii de portofoliu de fonduri administrate de a16z. Deși este luat din surse considerate a fi de încredere, a16z nu a verificat în mod independent astfel de informații și nu face nicio declarație cu privire la acuratețea durabilă a informațiilor sau adecvarea lor pentru o anumită situație.
Acest conținut este furnizat doar în scop informativ și nu ar trebui să fie bazat pe consiliere juridică, de afaceri, de investiții sau fiscală. Ar trebui să vă consultați propriii consilieri cu privire la aceste aspecte. Referințele la orice titluri de valoare sau active digitale au doar scop ilustrativ și nu constituie o recomandare de investiții sau o ofertă de a oferi servicii de consiliere în materie de investiții. În plus, acest conținut nu este direcționat și nici nu este destinat utilizării de către niciun investitor sau potențial investitor și nu poate fi bazat în nicio circumstanță atunci când se ia o decizie de a investi într-un fond administrat de a16z. (Ofertă de a investi într-un fond a16z va fi făcută numai prin memoriul de plasament privat, acordul de subscriere și alte documente relevante ale oricărui astfel de fond și trebuie citită în întregime.) Orice investiții sau companii de portofoliu menționate, la care se face referire sau descrise nu sunt reprezentative pentru toate investițiile în vehicule administrate de a16z și nu poate exista nicio asigurare că investițiile vor fi profitabile sau că alte investiții realizate în viitor vor avea caracteristici sau rezultate similare. O listă a investițiilor realizate de fondurile gestionate de Andreessen Horowitz (excluzând investițiile pentru care emitentul nu a oferit permisiunea ca a16z să dezvăluie public, precum și investițiile neanunțate în active digitale tranzacționate public) este disponibilă la adresa https://a16z.com/investments/.
Diagramele și graficele furnizate în cadrul sunt doar în scop informativ și nu trebuie să se bazeze pe acestea atunci când se ia vreo decizie de investiție. Performanța trecută nu indică rezultatele viitoare. Conținutul vorbește doar de la data indicată. Orice previziuni, estimări, prognoze, obiective, perspective și/sau opinii exprimate în aceste materiale pot fi modificate fără notificare și pot diferi sau pot fi contrare opiniilor exprimate de alții. Te rog vezi https://a16z.com/disclosures pentru informații suplimentare importante.
- Andreessen Horowitz
- Bitcoin
- blockchain
- respectarea blockchain-ului
- conferință blockchain
- coinbase
- coingenius
- Consens
- conferință cripto
- cripto miniere
- cryptocurrency
- DataInnovation & CreativityUncategorized
- descentralizată
- DEFI
- Active digitale
- ethereum
- masina de învățare
- jeton non-fungibil
- Plato
- platoul ai
- Informații despre date Platon
- Platoblockchain
- PlatoData
- platogaming
- Poligon
- dovada mizei
- W3
- zephyrnet